Can electronic assessment tools improve the process of shared decision-making? A systematic review
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision making: A systematic review
OBJECTIVE To inventory instruments assessing the process of shared decision making and appraise their measurement quality, taking into account the methodological quality of their validation studies. METHODS In a systematic review we searched seven databases (PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Academic Search Premier) for studies investigating instruments measuring the...
متن کاملStudy protocol: a systematic review of pediatric shared decision making
BACKGROUND Shared decision making in pediatrics is unique because it often involves active participation of both the child or adolescent patient and his or her caregiver(s) in the decision making process with the clinician or care team, and the extent to which the patient is involved is commensurate with their developmental level. However, little is known about the nature of pediatric-specific ...
متن کاملthe impact of portfolio assessment on iranian efl students essay writing: a process-oriented approach
this study was conducted to investigate the impact of portfolio assessment as a process-oriented assessment mechanism on iranian efl students’ english writing and its subskills of focus, elaboration, organization, conventions, and vocabulary. out of ninety juniors majoring in english literature and translation at the university of isfahan, sixty one of them who were at the same level of writing...
15 صفحه اولOlder Patients’ Involvement in Shared Decision-Making—A Systematic Review
Shared decision-making has been described as allowing patients to gain more control over their life situation and feel less helpless. The aim of this systematic review was to describe the involvement of older patients in shared decision-making in community settings. In accordance with the systematic review method, a total of 2468 abstracts were read, after which nine quantitative studies were i...
متن کاملCan shared decision-making reduce medical malpractice litigation? A systematic review
BACKGROUND To explore the likely influence and impact of shared decision-making on medical malpractice litigation and patients' intentions to initiate litigation. METHODS We included all observational, interventional and qualitative studies published in all languages, which assessed the effect or likely influence of shared decision-making or shared decision-making interventions on medical mal...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Health Information Management Journal
سال: 2020
ISSN: 1833-3583,1833-3575
DOI: 10.1177/1833358320954385